Open Access
Original Article

Amendment procedure in sintered bush Manufacturing industry by the utility of Six Sigma DMAIC: A case study

Radius: Journal of Science and Technology

View PDF

Volume 2, Issue 1,  Article Number: 251002 (2025) 

Coverpage RadiusJST - Vol. 2 - Issue 1

Home >> Radius >> Volume 2, Issue 1

Raja Kumar1  |  Happa Khan1  |  Haris Arquam1,*ORCID logo  |  Ajit Bahadur Verma1

1Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arya College of Engineering, Jaipur, India 302028

*Corresponding Author: harisarquam@aryacollegejpr.com

Received: 13 January 2025 | Revised: 26 January 2025

Accepted: 28 January 2025 | Published Online: 31 January 2025

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15008528

© 2025 The Authors, under a Creative Commons license, Published by Scholarly Publication

Abstract

Six Sigma DMAIC is one such disciplined route that helps us focus on improving the world’s best merchandise, processes as well as services. “Sigma” is used to compute how a great deal in a specific manner departs from perfection. Sigma best levels additionally assist to set an impartial for the enhancement of the best of technique with the assist of DMAIC manner. A great execution of DMAIC mode confirms us to getting rid of the motives for fault by means with respect to outcomes of the manner, that’s critically critical to the consumers. By means of the use of DMAIC manner, the dissimilarity in the product or technology, loss of cloth and system errors can be minimized. DMAIC cycle is an essential part of Six Sigma. Multiculturalism, the evolution of the era, and enhancement in the call for of the calumet have modified the manner of doing commercial corporation of the groups great is the most vital client-pushed preference element in the desire among participating outcomes and solutions reducing the dissimilarity in outcome dimensions plays a critical pile is the improvement. This paper includes the Six Sigma DMAIC method modified into used to lower the method version of length of bush for reinforcing product exquisite. The outline section of DMAIC approach begins via manner of problem detection through the voice of internal and outside clients. The later level represents calculating the statistics of bush parts of existing ways.

Keywords

Process Capability analysis (PCA), Six Sigma DMAIC, Error Reduction, Process Optimization, Bush Dimension Control

References

  1. Patel, A. S., & Patel, K. M. (2021). Critical review of literature on Lean Six Sigma methodology. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 12, 627-674.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Amjad, M. H. H., Shovon, M. S. S., & Hasan, A. S. M. M. (2024). Analyzing Lean Six Sigma Practices In Engineering Project Management: A Comparative Analysis. Innovatech Engineering Journal, 1, 245–255.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Pongboonchai-Empl, T., Antony, J., Garza-Reyes, J. A., Komkowski, T., & Tortorella, G. L. (2023). Integration of Industry 4.0 technologies into Lean Six Sigma DMAIC: a systematic review. Production Planning & Control, 35, 1403–1428.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Ramakrishna, Y., & Alzoubi, H. (2022). Empirical Investigation of Mediating Role of Six Sigma Approach in Rationalizing the COQ in Service Organizations. Operations and Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 15, 122-135.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Citybabu, G., & Yamini, S. (2024), Lean Six Sigma and Industry 4.0 – a bibliometric analysis and conceptual framework development for future research agenda. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 73, 1502-1534.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Kumar, V., Cudney, E. A., Mittal, A., Jha, A., Yadav, N., & Owad, A. A. (2024). Mapping quality performance through Lean Six Sigma and new product development attributes. TQM Journal, 36, 2107-2131.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Bendell, T. (2006). A review and comparison of six sigma and the lean organisations. TQM Magazine, 18, 255-262.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Chakrabarty, A., & Chuan Tan, K. (2007). The current state of six sigma application in services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 17, 194-208.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Schroeder, R. G., Linderman, K., Liedtke, C., & Choo, A. S. (2008). Six Sigma: Definition and underlying theory. Journal of operations Management, 26, 536-554.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Watson, G. H., & DeYong, C. F. (2010). Design for Six Sigma: caveat emptor. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1, 66-84.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Kwak, Y. H., & Anbari, F. T. (2006). Benefits, obstacles, and future of six sigma approach. Technovation, 26, 708-715.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Antony, J. (2006). Six sigma for service processes. Business Process Management Journal, 12, 234-248.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Chakravorty, S. S. (2009). Six Sigma programs: An implementation model. International Journal of Production Economics, 119, 1-16.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Salah, S., Rahim, A., & Carretero, J. A. (2010). The integration of Six Sigma and lean management. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1, 249-274.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Reosekar, R. S., & Pohekar, S. D. (2014). Six Sigma methodology: a structured review. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 5, 392-422.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Gamal Aboelmaged, M. (2010). Six Sigma quality: a structured review and implications for future research. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27, 268-317.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Antony, J., Snee, R., & Hoerl, R. (2017). Lean Six Sigma: yesterday, today and tomorrow. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34, 1073-1093.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Antony, J., Palsuk, P., Gupta, S., Mishra, D., & Barach, P. (2018). Six Sigma in healthcare: a systematic review of the literature. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 35, 1075-1092.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Drohomeretski, E., Gouvea da Costa, S. E., Pinheiro de Lima, E., & Garbuio, P. A. D. R. (2014). Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Six Sigma: an analysis based on operations strategy. International Journal of Production Research, 52, 804-824.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. LeMahieu, P. G., Nordstrum, L. E., & Cudney, E. A. (2017). Six Sigma in education. Quality Assurance in Education, 25, 91-108.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Hilton, R. J., & Sohal, A. (2012). A conceptual model for the successful deployment of Lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29, 54-70.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. De Mast, J., & Lokkerbol, J. (2012). An analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC method from the perspective of problem solving. International Journal of Production Economics, 139, 604-614.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

  1. Albliwi, S., Antony, J., Lim, S. A. H., & van der Wiele, T. (2014). Critical failure factors of Lean Six Sigma: a systematic literature review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31, 1012-1030.

[View Article]       [Google Scholar]

Cite This Article

R. Kumar, H. Khan, H. Arquam and A. B. Verma, “Amendment procedure in sintered bush Manufacturing industry by the utility of Six Sigma DMAIC: A case study,” Radius: Journal of Science and Technology 2(1) (2025) 251002. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15008528

Rights & Permission

This is an open access article published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) International License, which allows unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. No permission is needed to reuse this content under the terms of the license.

For uses not covered above, please contact the Scholarly Publication Rights Department.